I have always been very wary of responses generated by neural networks. I constantly encounter hallucinations and obvious inaccuracies. Until now, every sentence in my texts was written by me, and out of respect for my readers, I did not intend to insert generated content. Even though I often resort to using automatic translation into English.
I don’t intend to create content using AI. However, for the purpose of self-education, I often ask questions and seek clarification on points I don’t understand (while maintaining a healthy level of skepticism toward the answers provided).
For many years, I have been interested in how, precisely, interactions in the universe are brought about. And now, having taken an interest in quantum mechanics once again, I’ve had a moment of insight. While the question first arose for me a very long time ago - about 20-25 years back. The answer roughly corresponds to the time when the article containing that answer was written. Only two years have passed since then, but I had an idea it was several times longer. Probably because I've learned so much since then. There are articles on my blog now that, today, seem like childish babble to me. But it was precisely these that gave rise to the beginnings of intuition in me.
And so, I have initiated chains of dialogue hundreds of times - sometimes uncovering new insights and connections, but more often discovering discrepancies with my own intuitive assumptions. I do not claim that my ideas are correct, and they are often modified based on new facts and greater knowledge.
For a long time, about a year, I wanted to write a more serious article that would describe my current ideas about the foundations of physical reality. Yesterday, I initiated a series of highly productive lines of inquiry; while I didn’t find a ready-made answer to my questions, I did gain new insights. When I woke up, the first thing I did was to clarify the remaining ambiguities, but my questions and my adjustments in the direction of my thoughts led me to a very interesting concept. Regarding the concept of quantum gravity. The AI kept heaping praise on me at every turn, which I found rather annoying. Figuratively speaking, "the ears are withering." What I wanted wasn't praise, but rather more substantive, relevant information. Moreover, in the past, whenever I asked for criticism of my reasoning, all such praise would instantly lose any weight. But, this time, the concept has turned out to be cohesive and comprehensive. However, it is quite likely that I have ventured well beyond the limits of my own expertise. Now, before I can even consider this concept worthy of being posted on my personal blog, I will need to verify almost every single claim - especially the formulas. And I highly doubt that I could manage this on my own. Therefore, as you read this, please view it not as a AI slop, not as scientifically rigorous argument, but rather as an approximate visualization of my own intuition.
Today is November 28, 2026; I wonder how much time it will take me to verify the concept, and how many hallucinations and inaccuracies I might overlook. Moreover, I will be preparing the article for publication in my spare time. I really hope that the excitement and enthusiasm I’m feeling right now will help me get this article ready more quickly.
P.S. This article was written by me personally and serves as a kind of disclaimer for my next article on quantum gravity.